Wrath of Man”- Hell hath no fury [MOVIE REVIEW

Wrath of Man Full Movie Does Guy Ritchie even know where his strengths and weaknesses lie as a director? When his films work, they tend to be driven by energy, atmosphere, and visual wit, which can sometimes paper over such notable shortcomings as narrative incoherence and idiotic dialogue. Yet Ritchie loves to double down on that narrative and dialogue. He can’t seem to tell a story, yet he keeps trying to tell more and more complicated ones. He can’t seem to create compelling characters or give them meaningful exchanges, yet his tales get more crowded and verbose. Last year gave us the dense, chatty, inert The Gentlemen, which brought Ritchie back to the intricate, multi-character crime dramas on which he initially made his name. Now we get the even more ambitious Wrath of Man, filled with shoot-outs and heists upon heists and reams of obnoxious banter that will make you wonder if sound cinema might have been humanity’s greatest mistake.

Bottom of Form

It’s odd that Wrath of Man is so alienating — it’s a revenge picture at heart, one of the most visceral of genres. (If the alienation came with a sense of artistic purpose, we might have had something, but here, it just feels like a miscalculation. More on that in a bit.) Jason Statham plays Hill, or “H,” an aloof, mysterious tough guy who starts working for an armored-truck company that was recently hit with a heist that killed two of their drivers and a bystander. We soon learn why H is really here: His own son was that murdered bystander, Wrath of Man Full Movie Free and he wants revenge. What’s more, H is himself a dangerous criminal — a powerful gangland boss whose own crew, in a rather wild coincidence, just happened to be, on that fateful day, staking out that very same armored truck for a future heist. We learn that he and his men have spent the past few months searching in vain for the killers, upending the underworld in their violent quest, but have failed to find the unknown crew responsible for the death of his son. So now, H has temporarily gone undercover on the right side of the law, lying in wait for the culprits to strike again.

Some chasmic gaps in logic aside, that’s actually a pretty nifty premise for a crime movie. (It’s based loosely on a 2004 French film, called Cash Truck, a.k.a. Le Convoyeur, directed by Nicolas Boukhrief.) And ordinarily, I’d be a sucker for this type of whiskey-sipping, lizard-brain, honor-among-thieves, manly-man bullshit, but Ritchie’s choices — and they are certainly bold choices — repeatedly confound. For all his visual bravado, he doesn’t seem to have any idea where to put the camera to best service a story or a scene. A small but telling example: He shoots the opening heist from the back of the armored truck, with our view of the driver pointedly concealed. Which would lead a viewer to believe that the man’s identity will in some way be significant. No, it’s meaningless. What’s more, shot from that perspective, the scene also winds up being totally incoherent. Admittedly, to preserve the time-juggling plot, some elements of the heist do have to be kept hidden — but Ritchie hides the wrong things. There’s a fine line between enigmatic and confusing, and he repeatedly bulldozes past it. As a result, the movie opens with a blast of muddy annoyance.

A somewhat more worrisome example: You would think that, given his own criminal ways, and given the fact that his own crew was also hoping to rob that truck, H would feel some sense of cosmic guilt over his son’s death. Indeed,  Wrath of Man 2021 Full Movie you would also think that the rather hilarious aforementioned coincidence regarding two separate crews targeting the same truck would practically mandate such a development — and we do see a scene of H’s wife blaming him for their son’s death. Ritchie shoots it from a distance, in one take, a sure sign of emotional reserve. This should be interesting: H’s own coldness, his dissociation from the consequences of his actions, could serve as an emotional through line in the film, maybe a subtle psychological engine powering his undying crusade for revenge. No such nuance exists, however. Ritchie can’t be bothered. The scene with the wife is a dead end for him, just an item to check off the list. Because, well, she would say that, wouldn’t she?

And then, Christ, there’s the dialogue. The writing in Wrath of Man isn’t just bad. It’s your-co-worker-signed-up-for-a-weekend-drama-workshop bad. Sometimes, the words are merely inane: “You ever thought about, uh, buying a coffee maker?” one guard awkwardly asks the other in the prelude to that opening heist scene. “A coffee maker?” “You know, the one that’s got that froster thing?” “Oh yeah, the frother. I got you.” “That way you can, you know, make your own cappuccino.” Is this supposed to be naturalistic?

Other times, the words are portentous: “What has the world come to? A direct line of evolution from Paleolithic man to a diabetic house husband,” a co-worker observes philosophically to H after a conversation about, Wrath of Man 2021 Full Movie uh, Pop-Tarts. And often the lines are just thuddingly obvious: “I don’t care what you guys think. That man’s a dark horse,” another co-worker helpfully observes about H early on. In case we didn’t get it, someone later opines that H isn’t just a man, that he’s “a dark spirit.” Then, a few seconds later, they repeat the line: “A dark fucking spirit.” (The film’s segments are broken into discrete chapters. The title of this chapter? “A Dark Spirit.”) There’s an idea here, of course, about masculinity encircled, about hunters become prey, primitive warriors forced into emasculated domesticity. But one needs more than ideas, and Ritchie keeps failing at the execution. The only thing uniting all this macho hothouse banter is that it’s regularly delivered in such half-hearted fashion that we might wonder if we’re listening to a read-through by mistake.

Published
Categorized as Movie